Whose a Liberal 2.0er

Who is a Liberal 2.0er

This meme is a visual embodiment of a Liberal 2.0er

Republican party: solid/hard NeverTrumpers, Lincoln Project (solidly to vastly)

Democrat party: The New Democrats, Center for American Progress Democrats, Democratic Socialists of America (rare radlib sects only), Communist Party of the USA (their Twitter and other social media only since their Twitter and other social media is being run by state department radlibs who wrongly scorn the US's working people)

Blue MAGA

ANTIFA (some), Wokescolds, The Neoliberal shitlib radlib-lib brigade who are against 'reactionary' centrism . Those Neoliberal shitlib radlib-lib brigaders are Michael Hobbes, Heet Jeer, Thomas Zimmer and Aaron Huertes

Liberal Universalism

Liberal 2.0 leftist subreddits mentioned here and here. Overall subreddits never posted to r/AgainstHateSubreddits or banned  

r/ShitLiberalsSay subreddit (Liberal 2.0 element and reliably Liberal 2.0 and shitlib 

The full on radlib cuck (i.e Liberal 2.0) element to SLS and its radlib cuck users and SLS's degenerate shitlibs/liberal 2.0 globalist users who have decided to larp as Stalinists for some incomprehensible reason. The many times on SLS when they and the SLS users who love woke idpol in such radlib way (i.e in a Liberal 2.0 way)

The few unhinged ultra-idpol freakies on SLS are Liberal 2.0

r/TankieJerk subreddit (has a bunch of stupid Leftoids with a Liberal 2.0 views and this is an element of it/there is a variant of Liberalism 2.0 on tankiejerk foremost and through and through)

Tankiejerk is less of a non Liberal 2.0 sub, blurred Liberal 2.0-non Liberal 2.0 sub and more of a collection of radlib (i.e Liberal 2.0) NPCs  

The times when their Anarchists have dumb takes and when the sub and its users unironically suffer from propaganda induced mental illness, (due to Russia) which means they are Liberal 2.0.

The Tankiejerk users who are moronic Liberal 2.0ers larping as socialists with those particular users get information from creepy streamer ecelebs. The tankiejerk analysis is purely emotionally driven and built around crying about the tankie bogeyman (thus they use a Liberal 2.0 analysis)

There is a Shitlib variant and Shitlib users on tankiejerk .Also since tankiejerk criticizes 'tankies' from the 'left' by design that subreddit is Liberal 2.0. 

Also the relatively rare Vaushites/Vaushite radlibs on tankiejerk with their cantina radlib stuff and meta posting is Liberal 2.0. Though some radlib stuff on Tankiejerk is too left for even some Vaushites and that is liberal 2.0 also

Tankiejerk users who downvote LibLeft r/PoliticalCompassMemes for not being 'left' enough are Liberal 2.0

Some of Tankiejerk 's authoritarianist mods for banning views they disagree with (which they ironically picked up from tankies themselves unknowingly) So this is a Liberal 2.0 thing too

Tankiejerk has some toxic bourgeois users and when they post it is a toxic sub (aka Liberal 2.0)

The Tankiejerks who are chauvinist radlib wokecalists are Liberal 2.0

Tankiejerk's liberal social fascist alliance slanders the r/wayofbern subreddit.  Tankiejerk is a Post liberal progressivism (like revolutionary progressiveness, transnational progressiveness, PMC progressivism) hivemind echo chamber (like r/Destiny) 

themajorityreport subreddit While most of the time it is good, due to the diversity of leftist thought there tends to be a small but significant shitlib element to it

r/EnoughPetersonSpam (or at least the Liberal 2.0 types mentioned here)

chauv stupid leftoid radlib wokecaslists genz dong (along with Stupidpol, Breadtube, COMPLETEANARCHY,  

r/AgainstHateSubreddits  Liberal 2.0  individualist  (stupid leftoid, radlib wokecalists woke users) , far left (by PCM standards), circlejerk of orange libleft w victim complex and persecution fetish 

AHS is technically a textbook crypto "hate" sub in disguise, often worse than the ones they're criticizing as they're ok with racism, homophobia, calls to violence, etc. as long as it's against the correct group. So AHS is a hate sub 

It's only "be kind" until the person has a political alignment that's not 100% what they agree with (looking at recent events of a certain video game). The 90 percent of AHS posts are Liberal 2.0 garbage

They ban any right wing sub that they deem 'wrongthink'. They are a hivemind

So AHS, aka AgainstHateSubreddits, are festering hive of white knights and keyboard warriors who brigade subs they feel violate the code of conduct they created and want everyone to abide by, and blow each other over how heroic they think they're being, because they've convinced themselves that everything they say and do is from the side of the angels?   They are part of the Lib Left that cannot defend their position 90 percent of the time

For those asking: the subreddit is AgainstHateSubreddits. A snitch sub that thinks they're the arbiters of what should and shouldn't be allowed on reddit. (And everywhere else) They think everything and everybody they don't like after nazis and racists. They whine to the admins about everything and try to get subreddits banned.

It stands for “AgainstHateSubreddits” it’s one goal is literally get subreddits they don’t like banned off of Reddit for “hate speech”.

AHS crybully entire subs and posters . Those that are a part of /r/AgainstHateSubreddits are notorious for using these tactics to wrest control over subreddits that oppose whatever the prevailing dogma is. 

Terminally online delusional 

That is not something a normal sub does. In fact, that is incredibly creepy that a person is going out of their way to catalogue disagreeable individuals.  

Anti-evil operations”

But for real, it’s AgainstHateSubreddits. They exist as volunteer message control for the company while letting themselves believe they’re literally crushing nazis to death under the keys of their keyboards.

It’s sort of a relic at this point, most truly controversial subs have already been nuked or went private. That’s why they’re picking at the scraps of political discussion now. Gotta find some hate to hate, otherwise the sanctimony withdrawals kick in.   AgainstHateSubreddits is what the Breadtube reddit calls 'libs'

Subs equally sour that are left-leaning don't go down in the same numbers right-leaning subs exist. In large thanks to the political persuasion of the r/AgainstHateSubreddits. It is quite a sensitive group much like r/FragileWhiteRedditor which funny enough is full of white redditors being as fragile as possible.

r/VaushV  (stupid 'leftoid', radlib wokecalists)  

r/196/  (Liberal 2.0 through and through)

r/rant 

r/popheadscirclejerk 

r/toiletpaperusa

r/enough_peterson_spam

r/enough sanders spam

r/gender cynical 

r/justiceserved

r/rubinreport and r/dave rubin

r/ask trump supporters

r/fragilewhiteredditor

r/marchagainstnazis 

r/politics Though I don't think the politics subreddit is that leftist. I generally agree with the blowback that the op got in this thread for falsely claiming that the politics subreddit is 'left wing'. Politics is a unique subreddit and while they are left of the New Democrats, they are not anywhere as left as this chud op in that above thread makes them out to be. Yet they are solidly Liberal 2.0 see some examples here. They clearly have a Liberal 2.0 bias but at least they seem open to left wing views so there is that

r/subredditdrama

local subreddits.   Very Liberal 2.0 filled with Liberal 2.0 brainwashed extremists. It's very rare that local subreddits represent the average mix of people in the general public. Like minds find like minds and drive away any that differ from the hive mind. r/politics is a perfect example of the end product. Local subreddits represent the silent minority in their cities political wise

r/localsubreddits are "militantly liberal 2.0" , any redditor that isn't as far liberal gets painted as a conservative over there. As everyone reading this knows, those subs is absolutely NOT representative of cities or even representative of Democrats in their cities at all

The mods who unfairly and wrongly blocked and smeared redditors as mentioned in this post. Those draconian, fascist, authoritarian, braindead, evil mods make me lose faith in humanity 

Gamefaqs politics boards : In general very Liberal 2.0. There are however a decent amount of users on those Gamefaqs politics boards that are fellow leftists and thus non Liberal 2.0

Even most of the Liberal 2.0ers on those political boards are grifters and or cynical which is base, but generally the Gamefaqs politics boards are very Liberal 2.0. They are such a treasure (and yes I am a fascist to them and proud of it. But gamefaqs love playing as villains in video games so there is that)

Metapedia  (more specifically the Chud, Conservative  2.0 variant of Liberalism 2.0)

Real Life Villains Wiki

As a whole Big Business as a whole is somewhat right of Liberalism 2.0. But the big businesses below are clearly Liberal 2.0

Jim Acosta , Hunter Avellone, Alec Baldwin, Dave Bautista, Joy Behar, Max Boot, Ryan Bort

Michael Brown (townhall.com,  (more specifically the Chud, Conservative  2.0 variant of Liberalism 2.0)

Steve Carell, Gretchen Carlson

Mike Cernovich (more specifically the Chud, Conservative  2.0 variant of Liberalism 2.0)

Cher

Carlie Cloverfield: extreme Liberal 2.0 who falsely smears anyone to the right of AOC and even far left and socialist progressives to boot . She knows nothing about politics (but still more than me) and is a partisan cheerleader for Liberal 2.0ers. She is a yellow journalist

Steven Colbert (person and character)

Ann Coulter  (more specifically the Chud, Conservative  2.0 variant of Liberalism 2.0)

SE Cupp

Dani Di Placido.   Dana is a hyper Liberal 2.0, just look at his hot trash hit pieces on JK Rowling (who has more talent in her pinky than Dana has in his entire demon possessed body) and Mark Dice. Dana admits there are stupid purity tests for Liberal 2.0ers but he still makes partisan attacks on JK Rowling and others . Dana is very much a walking talking Liberal 2.0 machine if there ever was one, Scott Dworkin

Jane Fonda

Samantha Foss   : This woke girl’s Cisphobic attacks on her dead father at his funeral is beyond the pale. She is a petty bourgeois, rich ,silver spoon spoiled brat who never had a real job in her life. She needs to gdt her head out of her ass and learn manners, respect, loyalty and kindness. She is a hypocrite, she hoards all that money when it can be used to help poor migrants, blacks, Transgender people etc.  Samantha Foss had serious and disturbing mental problems

I am fine with her calling her dad a racist since she is a self described black supremacist and calling whites racist is what black supremacists do. But even thrn she might have went over board calling her dad racist

David Frum (somewhat but is a reasonable Liberal 2.0er)

*Madeline Halpert (very much Liberal 2.0 but still not vastly. I liked her activism to find a cure for what killed her brother Garrett, her energy views are syncretic, creative and just what we need to fight climate change effectively)

Sarah Jeong

Hemal Jhaveri:  Racist extremist partisan bully who trashes anyone to the right and left of AOC as 'extremist' Hemal (and throws progressives and the few good Liberal 2.0 radlibs under the bus), is the epitome of Liberalism 2.0 and is encompasses everything I hate in a 'journalist'. 

Oh and to show just how Liberal 2.0 she is she has her pronouns in her profile. Seriously she is yellow media and she just provokes and dehumanizes people who she can't understand . She is a black eye to journalism and a horrible person.

This article is a perfect example of just what a partisan, bias, hack that Hemal Jhaveri is

Megyn Kelly (more specifically the Chud, Conservative  2.0 variant of Liberalism 2.0)

Jimmy Kimmel (except in his Anti China rant years back but seeing hoe Liberal 2.0ers have turned on China maybe that rant was Liberal 2.0 also via being ahead of its time)

Andrew Klavan, Bill Kristol, Talia Lavin

Taylor Lorenz : But I believe she is moving rightward but as it is now she is the very image of Liberalism 2.0. 

Marylou Who? (Ohio Capital Journal) 

Madonna

Seth Mandel

Michael Medved  (more specifically the Chud, Conservative  2.0 variant of Liberalism 2.0)

Debra Messing, Cassie P Miller, Seth Myers, Ana Navarro, Lawrence O’Donnell

Keith Olbermann (but was really good in the 2000s decade so I give him props for that)

John Oliver (for the most part but not insufferable politically and not vastly but still solidly secure as a Liberal 2.0er)

Nikki McCan Ramirez

She has no context, nuance, compassion, diplomacy. She also is not to be trusted in politics, and is partisan  (she is a member of Liberal Warriors for Free though so I downplay her partisanship caz of that). 

Her being a Liberal 2.0er clearly means she is too close to them to criticize them but that knowledge might come in handy in some situations so she isn't all bad. She literally only sees extremism outside of Neoliberalism and never on the Neoliberal side 

She exists only to be an attack dog for the Liberal 2.0 establishment which is lame

Ron Perlman, Dennis Prager, Dan Rather, Michael Reagan, Ron Reagan 

Alexander Reid Ross As an Anarchist Ross is non liberal 2.0 being mostly left of Liberalism 2.0. His Fascist Creep and Multipolar red green brown alliance writings are Liberal 2.0. If Ross is as conservative as Grayzone claims he is , Ross would actually be slightly right of Liberalism 2.0 and non Liberal the other way

Jennifer Rubin

Aaron Rupar, Brian Stelter

Chelsea 'Sully' Sullenberger (the guy who crashed a plane into the Hudson river)

Ben Stiller, George Takei, Nicole Wallace (partisan Liberal 2.0 divisive, mean spirited hack), Brian Williams, Kevin Williamson

Liz Cheney : Due to Liz Cheney being a Neocon imperialist hypocrite (why can’t she be a Left Interventionalist, Left Neocon or Alexander Reid Ross type of Imperialist instead?), Cheney enabling Liberal 2.0 policies through her non stop endless anti Trumpism crusades which cause collateral damage

All Liz Cheney does is bash Trump and his troll supporters non stop, which is grave dancing and is so 2021. I agree with this article on Liz Cheney. Now her Anti Trump and Anti MAGA obsession is getting her in trouble with the Democrats too. Liz Cheney is an epic FAIL just like her devil dad

She says nothing about how she can fix things and you never hear her bash Democrats. She never stops bashing Republicans non stop. It gets old quick. It is between questionable and cringe for Liz Cheney to go after Ron Desantis. Desantis is more liberal than Cheney on over 67 percent of issues (like minimum wage, economics, guns, immigration, abortion etc)  

There is nothing that Desantis has done to justify Cheney’s crusades against him since they have similar views

Even if Desantis probably deserves to be in prison, since Cheney won’t call for Desantis to be thrown into prison, she might as well lay off of him, and focus her crusades on different right wing threats

Liz Cheney was wrong to endorse Tim Ryan. She didn’t have to endorse JD Vance but her endorsing Ryan proves she is a traitor to her party, as this article shows . Vance is left of Liz Cheney, it makes no sense except out of spite for Trump endorsing Vance for Liz to  endorse Ryan, Liz has gone too far. Goodbye Lizzie you neocon, imperialist warmonger, colonialist. Of course her boytoy Jamin Raskin still loves her

See here and here. This article is fake news. Krysten Sinema is a billion times better than Liz Cheney. If Cheney was like Krysten Sinema, I would warm up to Liz Cheney.  The reason Krysten gets flak is because when she is bipartisan she helps the Republicans (who are mostly non Liberal 2.0) , which is the opposite of Lizzie

Liz Cheney also wrongly demonizes AOC .On social and economic issues, Cheney is non Liberal 2.0 for the most part. 

I am glad that Liz Cheney wasn’t as harsh on Harriet Hagman as I feared she would be (since Hagman has mentally issues and insulting mentally handicap people like Hagman is bad optics). By Liz Cheney standards, she treated Hagman decent and I applaud her for that.

counterpoint: Why should a former radical right winger like Liz Cheney call out a group of people (Liberal 2.0ers and Democrats as a whole) she does not have experience with in equal measure as the trollish haters (radical Right wingers like some MAGAs) that she had first hand experience with? Maybe we should not try to encourage Liz Cheney to be bias toward finding balance when there really is no balance to be had. Radical right wingers are a more hyped threat than Liberal 2.0ers are after all.

Kristen Gillibrand (use to be non Liberal 2.0 but now she is almost very image of Liberal 2.0)

Ted Kennedy

Kamala Harris (though I do like her pragmatism, her being decent on Russia , her practical outlook)

Adam Kinzinger : see Liz Cheney above, George McGovern (barely Liberal 2.0)

Walter Mondale  Though  non Liberal 2.0 Charles Krauthammer was Walter Mondale’s speech writer and Mondale supported equity feminism (ERA) which is non Liberal 2.0 in both directions. However judging by Mondale’s 2020 speech he had mostly proto Liberal 2.0/ Liberal 2.0 views to the core 

Gavin Newsome: If Gavin is serious about making red states become literally like California by force I can get on board with that. If red states are to move left might as well go radlib like California. This way Gavin and the coastal elites can no longer trash red states.

This ad by Gavin actually seems pretty base and cool. Make him seem like a good non Liberal 2.0 politician

Gavin Newsome might get a pass for his extreme Liberalism 2.0 due to it being an emergency response due to California’s vast inequality issues (or maybe Liberalism 2.0 caused those vast inequalities in California like a chicken or an egg thing);but Newsome takes that and runs with it. 

Gavin Newsome is the very image of Liberalism 2.0 even though as mentioned he has an excuse due to California’s vast inequality issues. 

I liked Gavin Newsome’s Welcome to SF message in 2009 on my SF trip and his anti sanctuary city views in the 2000s and even his unique Left wing (non Liberal 2.0)  pro lgbtq 2000s actions as opposed to his Liberal 2.0 pro lgbtq actions now. 

For example I LOVED Gavin saying in 2008 before the Prop 8 vote “This door's wide open now. It's going to happen, whether you like it or not.". 

I like how he let anti gay Californians know that since the door was wide open, Prop 8 opponents had no choice but to push for Prop 8 to be defeated. Newsome’s statement thus attempted to convince Prop 8 supporters that Prop 8 opponents have an excuse to oppose Prop 8 which meant Newsome was trying to help those Prop 8 supporters not be upset if Prop 8 failed 

However the fact that that speech by Gavin backfired on Prop 8 opponents shows that even when Newsome does good he still f*cks up royally  Gavin newsom is an authoriatian. From the crown act to banning the sale of gas lawnmowers to forcing schools to teach Ethnic studies, he is a horrible governor , person and father. 

Nancy Pelosi: Pelosi did a non Liberal 2.0 thing by pleasing Republicans with her Taiwan trip, Pelosi did a non Liberal 2.0 thing by rightfully defending Ilan Omar’s 1st amendment rights when Omar gave her opinion on 9/11, Pelosi did a non Liberal 2.0 thing by her being open to making us energy independent and Pelosi even works well with AOC (who has mostly non Liberal 2.0 views and actions as mentioned above). But other than those examples Pelosi is as Liberal 2.0 as one may imagine

So yes Nancy Pelosi leans left and is Liberal 2.0.  But, mostly, as mentioned above she is about the power of the House, and assembling coalitions, twisting them into line, to get things passed.

*Chuck Schumer (not as a snug fit as a Liberal 2.0 because he is not a radlib/shitlib/ or even progressive, he is pro Israel which is base, and he is willing to debate when needed  .But of course outside of that he has very Liberal 2.0 views, but more #resistance type than radlib, shitlib type. )

Nicola Sturegon:  Dictator of Scotland. But non lib 2.0 because she is in anti villain or so bad she’s good territory , plus she is a Nationalist which is not a liberal 2.0 thing to be. Conservapedia makes her sound far right which is as far from .liberal 2.0 as you can be

Justin Trudeau     Justin Trudeau is the poster child for Liberalism 2.0. He is no ‘Radical Centrist’ (if he was Radical Centrist, he wouldn’t be Liberal 2.0). Trudeau is an authoritarian, just like most Liberal 2.0ers. He is a sanctimonious,virtue signaling soy boy. But I think privately he blurs the line between Liberal 2.0 and non Liberal 2.0

Mary Trump (maybe privately at least somewhat non Liberal 2.0 But her cruel spotify boycott was as Liberal 2.0 as you can get)

ngos:

NGOs:

Moveon.org (pretty much)

Southern Potty Poverty Law Center (since the early 2000s or since early 2010s i.e here)

ADL (except on Israel which they are NON LIBERAL 2.0 right wing on)

NARAL (i.e here , or when these distracted from real issue hypocrites ditched Krysten Sinema for having the audacity to think for herself. That proved that NARAL doesn’t go all out for women's rights. I prefer Emily’s List and Planned Parenthood to woke, cringe NARAL)

media:

Associated Press is mostly Liberal 2.0, see here. Though Media bias fact check lists them as neutral so thst is why I wrote ‘mostly’

Bulwark

Buzzfeed (pretty much liberal 2.0 but has a decent [non liberal 2.0] side to it I guess)

CNN (soft Liberal 2.0)

Comic Sands website

Daily Dot

Daily Kos: an eternal shitlib gathering spot

Daily Stormer  (more specifically the Chud, Conservative  2.0 variant of Liberalism 2.0)

Democratic Underground (mostly): an eternal shitlib gathering spot

*Everyday Feminism (only if it wasn't a spoof and was real)

Forbes 

Goyim TV  (more specifically the Chud, Conservative  2.0 variant of Liberalism 2.0)

The Guardian (mostly)

Huffpost

The Independent 

Media Matters 

NPR

Ohio Capital Journal (i.e here)

PBS

Prager U

Raw Story

Reuters (somewhat)

The Right Stuff (more specifically the Chud, Conservative  2.0 variant of Liberalism 2.0)

Rolling Stone (no longer the countercultural, anti establishment force it once was. Also, Rolling Stone doesn't seem to have any political stance nowadays, except advocating for the opposite of what the Republicans are doing. They published this risible piece: "Why Cancel Culture is good for democracy", for instance:

https://archive.is/rK6kA

If the Republicans said that they supported heliocentrism then RS would publish a bunch of articles arguing the Earth was the centre of the Solar System.  stupdol

Salon (though not as anti left as I feared)

The View (most of the time)

Washington Post