Exh wikipdts

Wikipedia has at least a somewhat Liberal 2.0 bias. But I have seen enough Wikipedia articles on politics to know they that Wikipedia is not a Liberal 2.0 echo chamber . As per Wikipedia user Pudeo , Wikipedia is a lot less Liberal 2.0 bias than Big Tech, Reddit etc. Wikipedia goes left and Right of Liberalism 2.0 but it is Liberal 2.0 (until I decide to move Wikipedia left or right myself)

 "The way the terms "pseudoscience" and "fringe" are used on Wikipedia, is now akin to jewtagging. It's really quite disgusting. In the Wikipedia coverage of a lot of these areas in which I feel such psuedoscience/fringe tagging to be unwarranted, readers are treated like children, and are quite literally beaten over the head and forced to a conclusion. 

This is distinct from the original Wikipedia model of neutrality, where you simply present the facts, in due proportion to their reliability, and trust the reader to come to the right conclusion." See here for more and here for more

Wikipedia has so many political articles, that if you find a Liberal 2.0 bias in one article you can find a non Liberal 2.0 counter bias on that very same subject in a more obscure article on that subject that isn’t as heavily monitored

Wikipedia barely had a (proto) Liberal 2.0 or Liberal 2.0 bias in the 2000s decade

Wikipedia has many international versions so there will be less Liberal 2.0 bias in those Wikis

Wikipedia has cabals of biased Liberal 2.0 users . Here are some bias Liberal 2.0 fanchilds:

Aquillion (he or she is named after an enemy and boss from Final Fantasy. Aquillion is an enemy of non Liberal 2.0 users. Aquillion is probably a dweeb in real life and a real piece of work 

Carrite (shoe salesman like Al Bundy, drama monger, lives in dreary Oregon and has dreary comments on his personal vanity board Wikipediocracy, funny at times)

Drmies : Drmies is an Auburn football fanatic, professor who is as bad as my former MCC professors.

Drmies is someone who uses Wikipedia like it is social media. He is from the Netherlands and moved to Alabama of all places years back. Drmies plays favorites and protects editors who don't block him  He protects his allies (like El C, EEng) and blocks his enemies. 

Galobtter: Power hungry hat collector and an aggressive user. Though despite that he is solid ok as editor and a nice respectful person. But he is not perfect so I hate him

Goodday a Wikipedia cultist who sucks up to power users. Give Goodday the tools already.  But he is a broken clock user .

Grayfall: Old Wikipedian and angry mastadon who loves to get vandals blocked and thinks Wikipedia is his/her paint studio. Grayfall’s parents must have had a lot of misery raising him/her as a child since even as a kid Grayfall was an annoying, possessive, power hungry menace. Probably was a geek too

Muboshgu   A Derek Jeter stan who likes Jeter’s wood. Mubo uses sabremetrics on political articles. Also has a bit of an attitude. Mubo would say I am a Left Wing populist. He wants Wikipedians to scale the Wikipedia mountain but maybe Muboshgu should do so solo and stay up there so other users can get a turn editing in the news and baseball articles. Muboshgu also is secretly a Red Sox fan and he/she likes news rubbernecking

MrX (a toxic editor who complains more than he edits. MrX gets an X grade (worse than an F) for his Wikipedia work. MrX owns many articles and never plays nice with outsiders who edit said articles. He is a professional tool)

Neutrality

"Identity is a total mystery. A lot of observers suspect he too operated the El_C sysop account, and might have other sockpuppets on Wikimedia Foundation projects. There is more suspicion that MrX is an additional sockpuppet account.

Was first seen in May 2004, began editing the article about El Cid massively. Also was awe struck by the Abu Ghraib scandal and left leaning politician Dennis Kucinich, in addition to  John Kerry and Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action. Over the top robotic gnome. 

Tried to obtain admin privileges a few times in 2004, his first attempt was erased and hard to find (archive, his next attempt in August was a failure and caused a pathetic RFC to do his username). He finally became an admin in October 2004.  Note a lot of complaints about abusive acts on Wikipedia

His earlier laser focus on the Democratic Underground article demonstrates a conceivable connection to Democratic Underground. That article also has many possible sockpuppet accounts in its page history, which is immensely messy. It has increased and decreased, and been edit warred time and time again, since 2004.

He was brought into this strange arbitration in March 2005, which was decided by Jimbo Wales and "hushed up".

He was elected to the Arbitration committee December 2005, where Neutrality served for two terms with barely any attention drawn.

Likely notable simply for writing the five pillars of Wikipedia one afternoon. Intriguingly his original version did not have the principle that 'anyone can edit'. This was later added by another even less relevant editor. Despite all of this, the principle is often referenced by a crowd of ruffians whenever someone brings up the sensible notion of registered editing only.

Neutrality sustained his adminship and kept editing in his favorite topic areas afterward with an ongoing preference for leftist politics. His activity slowed down in 2012 and then went back to normal starting in 2015.

It would not shock me if Neutrality, El C and MrX were all meticulously sustained sockpuppets belonging to Cirt. They definitely have similar obsessions. Way more deeply crazy things have went on on Wikipedia in the past. Their blind support in editwarring by seasoned/legacy insiders should tell us something.

And just and fiy: not long ago, MrX tried to drag Guy Chapman before the Arbitration committee. And for his efforts, he was forced off Wikipedia. A user just DOES NOT criticize or cry to penalize Guy Chapman. 

This is because Guy Chapman, similar to pony friendship, is MAGIC. Guy is covered in pink sparkles of Wikipedia-Power." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/David_Gerard,_Neutralilty,_Cyrius_--_Archive

Northbysouthbarnof (Travis has a diaper fetish since he was 14, As a teen, he always waited until his parents left for him to engage in his diaper fetish odyessies which he posted online. Travis now works as a fed for national parks in which he kicks people off of their land just like he kicks Wikipedians off the site. He couldn’t wait to get his topic ban on political articles overturned), 

Philip Cross: Neocon imperialist Philip Cross has an anti left wing bias and edits Wikipedia like this

Cirt/Snooganssnoogans

"Snooganssnoogans". is more notable as his previous account: Cirt. You might recall, Daniel.....also I would not be astonished if CowHouse is ultimately exposed as a Cirt sockpuppet. He always retains a huge sock drawer.

And as is typical, dum dum admins like Bbb23, Materialscientist (a cyborg blocking machine who has blocked literally every living creature and every celestial body in the dimension at least twice) and Neutrality are protective of him. 

Now what has Cirt been up to the last few years. I ponder he backed away from Scientology, Werner Erhard, and TM, is putting in an effort to avoid battling over the Israel/Palestine issues and sniping at US conservative politicians (yet he still does both of those things at times), and now he has a desire to mask off bring down any journalist who "may be supporting the Bashar Assad regime" or the like

With Cirt it is each time personal, political, punitive and coarse. And consistently involves Israel criticism or Wikipedia's systematic hatred of L Ron Hubbard's Loon Squad--even if just in the backdrop. 

The users who have his back commonly have a background of supporting him in his conflicts over articles and behavior, which goes back to his early Scientology edit wars prior to 2007. For two years he tried to suck up to other users in an endeavor to pass his Sagecandor account through adminship to get the bit--but could not keep from fighting with users and making himself look foolish.

Users: Minassian Media. Bbb23, one of his loyal supporters, ultimately blocked Sagecandor in 2018. So Cirt used another sockpuppet account and he began to grind it. He has done that for many many years somewhat successfully.

He is a big time lunatic. Still. And if they keep up tolerating him, they just make themselves look stupider."

Comment by "Katnips" on Wikipediocracy, July 2019:

"The problem with Snoog isn't a left vs. right thing. It's a partisan thing, D vs. R. He's aggressively defensive of the modern (establishment) version of the U.S. Democratic Party. For instance, he thinks he's making himself look ecumenical by being an attack dog on Tulsi Gabbard's page, but yeah....no one who's anyone in the Democratic Party gives two licks about her (she's at Marianne Williamson's level, basically) so it's an easy way for him to score points and say "hey, I put negative content on Democratic pages, too!" Yeah, ones that don't matter. 

And for some reason the deeply grandfathered-in admin Neutrality goes around cleaning up Snoog's messes for him and no one seems to notice/care. On many political issues I certainly agree with Snoog, but I've come to deeply resent what a bully he is. His strategy is basically to be an insufferable asshole and to continualy raise the costs of anyone who disagrees with him. 

Most (sane) people give up, leaving him to effectively take ownership over whatever articles he likes. Whatever one's politics, this isn't a healthy dynamic for Wikipedia. And it has made me quite suspicious that he's being paid, because what kind of volunteer would be so extremely dogged in such an icky, toxic environment. I stopped editing years ago but still have to hate watch my favorite show, ha."

non Liberal 2.0 Wikipedians 

CLC Student (great rcp vandal fighter)

Crowsnest/Jakeisasellot (Wikipedia sucks poster and transit worker), Icewhiz

Iamreallygoodatcheckers (moderate Chud)

El C, Eric Barbour , Kumioko ,L293D 

Larry Sanger (I love this signpost article on Larry Sanger)

Larry Sanger "Tired of the libs?" What Larry Sanger is really saying: "MOMMY!!!! They're still right, but it's my turn to be right!!!) /s

Masem , MONGO ,Mr Ernie, Pudeo,  Winkelvi

Wikipedians who blurs the line between Liberal 2.0 and non Liberal 2.0 : Andrevan, Cullen326 (Sierra Club leader, the wise elder, former hippie), Czello (likes instruments, vandal fighting and pov talk and long walks on the beach)

David Gerard (David Gerard is like the resident mascot for Wikipedia and he loves stirring up madness)

Fae (rightfully stood up for and defended INeverCry at INeverCry's wiki show trial)

Flyer22, 

GorillaWarfare Molly is a hacker which is base. She edits far right and right wing extremist in a fair and level headed way, she is anti bitcoin which is contrarian so also base and so she should be commended for all of that. She is though Center Left so she might have numerous Liberal 2.0 views (including wrongly deleting the pro traditional marriage UBX) 

Levivich , 

Slimvirgin

Hillbilly Holiday (now a Wikipediocracy power admin)

See this,and this for more. Wikipedia only uses Liberal 2.0 sources and rejects non Liberal 2.0er sources (it rejects non Liberal 2.0 sources like Newsweek, the Grayzone, RT, the Daily Mail, NY Post, Medium, The Epoch Times, Occupy Democrats, Zero Hedge, International Business Times, Media Bias Fact Check, The Post Millennial, The Babylon Bee, The Onion, Quilette, The Global Times and Gawker)

Wikipedia is not an accurate source of information , students should never use it for research and Wikipedia isn’t anywhere near being the most ‘trusted source on the internet’ LOL. 

The Liberal 2.0 MSM love Wikipedia because Wikipedia parrots their deceit on topics like: 

Russia-Ukraine (Wikipedia denies that there are separatists in Ukraine), the kids in cages-family separation double standard hysteria (Yes Trump is anti migrant but Wikipedia ignored that there were also ‘kids in cages’ under former President Barack Obama and now under Joe Biden), Wikipedia exaggerating those immigration detention areas by falsely calling them ‘concentration camps’ (those detention centers were harsh but they were not ‘concentration camps’ , Wikipedia similarly exaggerating January 6 2021 by falsely comparing it to 9/11, Pearl Harbor (thousands of Americans died in those two attacks) and JFK’s assignation, Wikipedia being Anti Communist, Wikipedia being anti bitcoin, Wikipedia’s coverage on China’s abuse of the Uyghurs, Wikipedia being anti Brexit, Wikipedia being Transphobic, Wikipedia being Anti Bernie Sanders, Wikipedia being Anti Jeremy Corbyn, Wikipedia being biased in both directions on Israel-Palestine in opposite ways that I am etc and a few other topics (you can get a clue of what those topics are from my blog)

Wikipedia is also bias in favor of Zoophilia, Pedophilia, drugs, etc

Wikipedia doesn’t have enough LGBTQ coverage (like on Queer Neutrality, Gender voluntarism etc) which is proof that Wikipedia also has a heteronormative and cisgender centric bias . 

I was a Gender gap task force member, Rollbacker, New Page Reviewer, Pending Changes Reviewer, and Articles for Creation reviewer for almost a year on Wikipedia. I saw enough much Liberal 2.0 bias by users and on Wikipedia I had to quit. 

I am also a Wikipedia lurker on that site and I know most power users and admins and their backstories and feuds on that site (like Neelix’s redirect trolling where they needed to create a bot to delete his trollish redirects, vandal fighting admin Edgar181’s sockpuppeting, Dreadstar quitting due to him getting heat for RIGHTFULLY unblocking Mark Bernstein who was the victim of a senseless block, that Northbysouthbarnof has a diaper fetish

Wikipedia co founder Jimbo Wales is married to former UK PM Tony Blair's former diary secretary 

Tony and Cherie attended the wedding. The scandals of Wikipedia’s neocon/anti-Jeremy Corbyn/pro-Israeli bias has already been exposed in the UK, where ocd editors (like Philip Cross) were writing combative entries on any and all critics of government foreign policy. https://wikipedia.fivefilters.org/

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/05/the-philip-cross-affair/.  https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/04/information-wars/

https://www.thecanary.co/discovery/analysis-discovery/2018/05/23/the-philip-cross-scandal-how-wikipedia-is-being-used-against-left-wing-journalists/

https://www.medialens.org/2018/caught-in-the-cross-hairs-media-lens-and-the-mystery-of-the-wikipedia-editor/

Kate Garvey, Jimbo Wales wife (their courtship began in Davos), worked on Live 8 in Tony Blair's attempt to distract from the Gleneagles G8 summit. 

She took up a post within the PR firm Freud Communications and in 2007 she was selected as one of the WEF’s "Young Global Leaders" and she has worked in PR for Bono, the 2012 Summer Olympics, The Blair Faith Foundation and Queen Raina of Jordan. Freud Communications were found to have been editing Wikipedia articles on behalf of clients https://www.prwatch.org/node/6413

It is ironic, hundreds of  Liberal 2.0 Wikipedians came to the rescue of non Liberal 2.0 Fram who was banned for a very non Liberal 2.0 act. 

Andrew Orlowski is correct that Wikipedia is now Wokepedia and by Wikipedia being that way it is a tone deaf disservice to every user

I am against Wikipedia not allowing users to have a userbox on their homepage saying they support traditional marriage. The ubx was on the user’s userpage not in a public area. 

What is truly horrible is that Wikipedia EXPLOITED the 2020 racial unrest stories to delete that ubx and Wikipedia is wrong, evil and repugnant for exploiting that unrest to delete that ubx .

THE RACIAL INJUSTICES STORIES SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN EXPLOITED TO DO DELETE A A PRO TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE UBX . 

HAVING A PRO TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE UBX IS NOWHERE NEAR AS BAD OR BIGOTED AS BEING RACIST OR ANTI BLACK AND ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE IS A RETARD Wikipediatards

That ubx is provocative but deleting and banning that userbox is worse than that userbox itself. If Wikipedia either deletes all political ubxes or allows a straight pride userbox, I will then be ok with the traditional marriage ubx being deleted and banned. Freedom of speech

You're not "welcome" to edit Wikipedia in any even vague sense of the word. To even begin to contribute to Wikipedia without getting your edits immediately reverted, you must get acquainted with the byzantine bureaucracy of editing. 

Then, you must to hope to the high heavens that your chosen topic is not the private fiefdom of or more turboautists who will spend more editing time than you believed was humanly possibly fighting to keep exclusive control of said article. If anything, new contributors on Wikipedia are on average decidedly unwelcome, often seen as clueless interlopers trespassing on the pristine domain of whichever self-appointed priestly caste that has taken over any given domain

 See more here

etc