MyTrueandRealPoliticalViews

  This tweeter is a bleeding heart, paternalistic biocentric (just like me). You would think based on my blog that I would agree with this Tweet or like her Tweet, but while I am between understanding to her views and sympathetic to her views in this Tweet, she is obviously wrong on so many levels in this Tweet, that I don’t know where to begin. How can you read this tweet and not come to the conclusion that people like her are being fed destructive ideologies?  Also this tweet comes across as very racist towards non white people (which I show below) .  Yes, I am fine with whites putting poc (i.e African Americans) ahead of their own white race-ethnicity, I want animals after they die to live as humans in a future life at least once before they go to the afterlife so they can finally be equal to humans so I have unique views on biocentrism and animals, I am an enemy of whiteness (though see  here  and  here , also through Afro-pessimism I make a critic...

Some people, including some LGBTQ people say that someone is born LGBTQ (i.e Gay-Queer/Transgender) instead of being LGBTQ (i.e Gay-Queer/Transgender) by choice is equating LGBTQ (i.e Gay-Queer/Transgender) status with disability For some LGBTQ (i.e Gay-Queer/Transgender), people, it is a choice. I dislike the narrative that LGBTQ (i.e Gay-Queer/Transgender) are helpless victims of their gender and/or sexuality. Some of them chose, and so freaking what? Some people , including some LGBTQ people say that it can be DAMAGING to the LGBTQ+ movement to relegate their gender and sexuality to something that is against their will (with some leftists saying that there is no gay gene, and that the Kinsey scale was debunked before it even got big). https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160627-i-am-gay-but-i-wasnt-born-this-way Some exerts from that article: “Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no f...

Omniliberalism believes in the core principles of liberalism, freedom and equality, whilst believing in elements of other ideologies in a pragmatic way

Wikipedia has at least a somewhat Liberal 2.0 bias. But I have seen enough Wikipedia articles on politics to know they that Wikipedia is not a Liberal 2.0 echo chamber . As per Wikipedia user Pudeo , Wikipedia is a lot less Liberal 2.0 bias than Big Tech, Reddit etc. Wikipedia goes left and Right of Liberalism 2.0 but it is Liberal 2.0 (until I decide to move Wikipedia left or right myself)  "The way the terms "pseudoscience" and "fringe" are used on Wikipedia, is now akin to jewtagging. It's really quite disgusting. In the Wikipedia coverage of a lot of these areas in which I feel such psuedoscience/fringe tagging to be unwarranted, readers are treated like children, and are quite literally beaten over the head and forced to a conclusion.  This is distinct from the original Wikipedia model of neutrality, where you simply present the facts, in due proportion to their reliability, and trust the reader to come to the right conclusion." See here for more...

https://www.adl.org/racism From ADL “* In the above definition, the term “white supremacy” refers to the systematic marginalization or oppression of people of color based on a socially constructed racial hierarchy that privileges people who identify as white. It does not refer to extremist ideologies which believe that white people are genetically or culturally superior to non-whites and/or that white people should live in a whites-only society      How is that not white supremacism? How can we take the ADL’s reporting on white supremacy seriously when they fundamentally change the meaning of it like that? The ADL'S definition of racism is itself racist because it ‘privileges’ white people in its definition. Here is my favorite contradiction “acknowledging white-supremacy as a problem is white-supremacist" LOL you can’t make this s**t up if you tried “Though many believe that race is determined by biology, it is now widely accepted that this classification system was in ...